Sunday, December 20, 2009

Earth Trust

Ecological economics and the ownership and treatment of land:
the Earth Trust

By David Haenke

Part 8 of 8 Ecological Economics and Bioregionalism, a cornerstone document for creating a regenerative economy.


I realize that what I have said thus far about a new
overall praxis of economics does not include the fundamental
question of ownership of the land as presently defined in the
capitalist and socialist models. It is an abomination for any
system to carry on the belief that ownership, either by
individuals, corporations, or the state, includes the right to despoil
any part of the Earth.

My personal belief on ownership and enterprise is that
neither individuals nor the state can truly hold title to
anything, but that the whole Earth and everything on it is
a commons which belongs to no one but the Earth, GAIA. I
here acknowledge its implicit existence and call it into
being simply by naming it: The Earth Trust.

Any human activity needs to be seen as carried out under
an implicit ecological lease covenant from the Earth, which
expires with our personal, collective, or corporate life.
(No more "immortal" personal or corporate holdings.)
This of course is a heterodox view in the "civilized" world,
and is recognized by few, First Peoples, Bioregionalists,
and some Greens.

No matter what we believe about ownership, the best we
can do now is stick to the ecological evaluation and modality
of economic activity and ownership. There is no evidence to
support that either ownership by individuals, or the state,
will protect and adequately care for the land in any given
political-economic system with any degree of consistency or
certainty. Using ecological economics as best we can under
the present dysfunctional systems we will just have to do
the best we can in mitigating the damage caused by present
nations’ concepts of ownership rights.

Something to hold in mind and work for through the generations:
Establish the Earth Trust under the Ecological Covenant of Earth.

Friday, December 18, 2009

Bioregional ecological economics: a prescription for health:
by David Haenke

Part 7 of Ecological Economics and Bioregionalism, a cornerstone document for creating a regenerative economy.

I have characterized our present economic modalities as the
prime cause of kind of sickness -- cancerous in nature -- inflicting the Earth and all its life with what is, on our present course, terminal entropy. Below I will describe what I characterize as a "prescription for health": bioregional ecological economics.

"Eco-economics" means bioregionally-scaled economies designed
on the basis of ecological principles. It means running an
economy the way nature runs a forest. Ecological principles
mandate decentralization, deconcentration, and regionalization of
our economic systems. As much as possible, there must be local
production, consumption, and full-scale recycling, drawing from
local resources. It further mandates that no economic activity
be allowed that is destructive or compromising to the ecological
integrity of the region within which it takes place

Under bioregional economics," capital and resources are
cycled within the region. As little as possible is allowed to
"leak out." Presently macro-economic activity creates a continual
hemorrhaging from localities, which are bled dry of capital,
energy, resources, people, etc. This is true in every country on
Earth, even within the first world nations.

Under bioregional economics, the consumer society must become
the producer-conserver society, where the real work for people
becomes economic and political empowerment through each home,
family, community, and region producing as many of its own basic
requirements, using ecological technologies, as possible. This
considerably disintermediates the need for money, effectively
beginning the necessary demonetization of human life.

Instead of working a meaningless job to get the money to
buy necessities, part of our real work becomes the efficient
production or more direct involvement (such as through working
membership in cooperatives) in procurement of these things
ourselves. This bypasses the circuitous, wasteful, and
entropic formation, procurement, and expenditure of capital
to do the same thing. Thus the formal "work week" wherein we
labor for money can drop considerably, perhaps to 20 hours or
less. Of course for some significant part of the rest of the working
week we would be laboring to more directly produce some of
what we formerly used money to buy.

This eco-economy runs as much as possible on solar energy,
just as ecosystems run entirely on solar gain. We make
judicious use of "capital" resources such as fossil fuels,
which are used according to their most efficient application,
as in the "soft energy path" ideas of Amory Lovins.

Eco-economics means bringing the economy home, and embedding
it cooperatively in the web of life of our bioregions.


To summarize, the basic bioregional economic prescription
is, to the greatest extent possible:

* Participants in, invest in, and support local, ecologically-
responsible production, by locally owned, operated, and
controlled enterprises.

* Buy, trade, consume locally and bioregionally-produced goods
and services.

* Work to strengthen the local and bioregional economy.

* Keep resources, capital, energy at home: plug leaks.

* Use solar energy, and other "renewable" energies and resources.

* Radically efficient use of non-renewables.

* Intense conservation and efficiency in all sectors.

* Full scale--90-100 percent recycling done by local and biore-
gional enterprises.

* Pay true, ecologically-audited costs: internalize "externalities."

* (Work toward) formal or informal local and bioregional trading
system or currency.

* Support a humane and socially responsible economy.

* Don't support business that pollute or destroy the ecology.

* Conversely, whenever possible, avoid buying from national
or multinational-scale corporations, their subsidiaries, or
state-owned enterprises. Each locality, region, bioregion, or
state would establish an up-to-date database identifying what is
being sold, and the ownership is of the company selling a given
product in their territory. This information would be furnished
to the public so that they can choose the local and regional
alternative where possible. Ongoing development of economic
alternatives to nationals and transnationals would be a focus of
each bioregion.

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Bioregions and bioregionalism in economic thought

Bioregions and bioregionalism
by David Haenke

Part 6 of Ecological Economics and Bioregionalism, a cornerstone document for creating a regenerative economy.



Throughout our exploration of ecological economics, we have emphasized that if humanity
to survive, there is no question that our economies and systems of production and distribution of vital physical goods must come under a new regime of ecological decentralism. I am positing
that the ultimate locus of ecological economics is the "bioregion", and its practice is "bioregionalism".

A bioregion is a geographical area whose boundaries are
determined by nature and not solely by humans. One bioregion is
distinguished from another by characteristics of flora, fauna,
water, climate, rocks, soils, landforms, and the human settle-
ments and cultures these characteristics have given rise to.

Bioregionalism is a comprehensive "new" way of defining and
understanding the place where we live, and of living there sus-
tainably and respectfully. In truth, what Bioregionalism repre-
sents is only new for people who come out of the Western indus-
trial-technological heritage. Its essence has been reality and
common sense for native people living close to the land for thou-
sands of years, and remains so. At the same time, bioregional
concepts are rigorously defensible in terms of science, technology,
economics, politics, and other fields of "civilized" human
endeavor.

Using ecology as the discriminator, Bioregionalism takes the
best and most presently relevant of the old, and synthesizes it
with most appropriate of the new. Bioregionalism is the most
ecological of systems of social organization, excepting the life
ways of native and indigenous peoples who still live traditionally
in intact ecosystems. It is a complete and all-inclusive way
of life, comprising the whole range of human thought and endeavor.
Bioregionalism offers a comprehensive restructuring of most
human systems using ecological design principles.

Monday, December 14, 2009

Towards the Ecological Corporation

Towards the ecological corporation:
by Davel Haenke

Part 5 of Ecological Economics and Bioregionalism, a cornerstone document for creating a regenerative economy.


I identify the following trends that will increasingly
affect corporations in major ways:

* More litigation by health-affected workers and the public.

* Better profit potentials for energy and resource efficiency,
by-products re-use and recycling, and on-site reduction and
treatment of toxics and pollutants.

* More pro-environment financial pressure from stockholders
and investors, particularly through the socially and
ecologically responsible investment movement.

* Increasingly positive consumer response to corporations ad-
judged to be "clean."

* A greater degree of social and ecological responsibility.

I suggest that this leads not just to a climate favorable to
producing and selling some "green" products, but to the necessity
of the creation of truly ecological corporations and businesses.

The evolution into a true eco-corporation has these implica-
tions:
* The corporation is re-structured, from the ground up, on
principles, policies, practices, efficiencies that are
ecologically determined, selling only ecologically benign
products. These modalities are built into the articles of
incorporation, the bylaws, the standard operating policies,
the manufacturing practices, the advertising, marketing, and
distribution strategies, and the public face.

* Full protection for the environment, workers, and the public
in at all areas and levels of production and distribution
is a given.

* Physical production plants and processes are ecologically
designed, constructed, and integrated. Operations are
oriented towards resource and energy efficiency, on-site
reduction, re-use, recycling or re-manufacture of by-products
into new products.

* Physical decentralization of production, marketing and
distribution.

* The "ecological audit" will become the basic guideline for
determining profitability and viability.

What does this eco-corporation strategy accomplish? It
effectively deals with the problems and opportunities inherent
in the trends mentioned above. Ecological self-regulation,
internalized, becomes a profit strategy. The need for government
regulation is minimized. "Externalities" are internalized,
becoming efficiency indicators and profit enhancers. This must be
the company of the future.

Transforming the mega-corporation

During the time of transition into an ecological economy
(functioning at true cost, with subsidies substantially dimin-
ished or eliminated), "mega-corporations" ( both national and trans-
national) may still be able to continue to provide functions and
services which their host societies have
not yet learned to do without. This can be true even after the
first stage of their transformation, which is the decentraliza-
tion and deconcentration of their physical operations into eco-
logically-scaled local and regional units. These units would be
pushed towards producing and distributing goods regionally.
Increasingly, they would use regionally available raw materials,
energy sources, and labor for production. Activities within the
structure of a given corporation would then be limited chiefly to
the flow of information and capital. Shipment of physical re-
sources and products over long distances must be minimized.

Saturday, December 12, 2009

Eco-economics and the Market System


Eco-economics and the market system

by David Haenke

Part 3 of Ecological Economics and Bioregionalism, a cornerstone document for creating a regenerative economy.
Ecological principles, internalized into businesses and
production enterprises, in any nation, can offer viability
with ecological integrity, while removing or substantially
mitigating social and ecological destructiveness from
market and production activity.

When ecological principles are applied to economics, a
number of otherwise intractable problems are illumined and
made soluble. These include: the rationale and methodology
for internal self-regulation for economic enterprises (with-
out relying on government); the nature and criteria for
appropriate, responsible growth (which sectors of a given
economy should shrink, and which should expand); resource
depletion; optimal scales of production and distribution.

It is obvious that the market systems around the world
are going to have to undergo a basic greening. It is in the
interest of corporate leaders to look as far ahead as possible
now, not only for the good of their companies, but for the
nations and the critically threatened ecologies that make possi-
ble their very existence. Now that market economics has, glo-
bally, become virtually "the only game in town," the necessity
for effective, responsible corporate leadership and stewardship
is imperative.

Thursday, December 10, 2009

Ecological Audit

The ecological audit
by David Haenke

Part 4 of Ecological Economics and Bioregionalism, a cornerstone document for creating a regenerative economy.

The cornerstone and most powerful tool of ecologicaleconomics is the "ecological audit." The science, theory,and practice of the ecological audit is rapidly being developed,though it has a long way to go.

We know about financial audits. We have heard of theenergy audit. More fundamental and significant is theecological audit of an enterprise, or any given product orservice. It goes far beyond the "environmental audits" now being employed by some industries.

Some of the factors that the ecological audit would consider:

(note: whenever the term "full cost" is used. it means the ecologically audited cost.)

Waste, pollution, toxics (at any stage or level of business
process)

  • * Amount and kind of waste control
  • * Amount, kind and full cost of pollution or toxics created
  • * The impact and full cost to the environment of dealing with
  • waste
  • * Degree and manner of waste recycling
  • * Manner and impact of final disposal of wastes
  • * Level of reuse of waste.
  • Energy
  • * Form of energy inputs
  • * Efficiency of energy use
  • * Full cost of using energy sources.
  • Production--Resource Inputs
  • * Whole impact of production on environment, ecological systems,
  • species
  • * Level and kind of resource use
  • * Where the resource comes from
  • * Method and full costs of resource extraction
  • * Mode and cost of transportation of resource to point of use.
  • Distribution
  • Distances from production point that products are marketed,
  • related to:
  • Full energy and resource cost of transportation to markets,
  • type of transportation

* Whole (ecologically audited) cost of packaging

Marketing

* Full cost of packaging

* Full cost of advertising

Monetary and other capital inputs

* Source, and nature of the source of investment money

* Full cost of investment money

* Whether the business is locally owned and operated

* Source and nature of business capitalization

* Where profits go and eventually end up

* Where profits and assets are invested

* What happens to money invested

* The level, nature and source of business subsidies, such as:
cheap access to natural financial resources, public tax
money, regulatory breaks, tax breaks; below-cost access to
physical resources; incentives; regulatory favors; conces-
sions; inside information; depletion allowances; below market
cost access to financial resources

Human community

The Human Economy can be seen as:

* Source of labor

* Salary and wage paid to labor relative to averages for the
same kind of work in other places

* How well the enterprise integrates, not only into the local
human community, but also into the existing natural communities

* Cost of not conforming to community and governmental standards
and regulations

* The amount of business resources put into enhancement of the
health of the local community and ecological health

* Degree and kind of social responsibility

(end of ecological audit criteria)

Hopefully the time will come soon when these factors and
dozens more will be quantified, and the numbers rigorously run
and available.

As soon as possible human societies must begin to understand
the true cost or viability of anything or any enterprise can
only be determined by the ecological audit. Passing the test of
the ecological audit will determine both the long term financial
viability of any given business, as well as its acceptability in
the community.

At the same time, eco-auditing will provide a powerful
tool for economic enterprises to evaluate their real profitabili-
ty, as well as determine the best methods for them to self-regu-
late themselves in ways not determined by government or the
arbitrary, ecologically and socially destructive forces of the
money and investment-driven marketplace.
Profit and acceptable rate of growth
by David Haenke

Part 3 of Ecological Economics and Bioregionalism, a cornerstone document for creating a regenerative economy.


Since most economic rhetoric of both the socialist and
capitalist varieties is now meaningless and confusing, much
of it must be dispensed with, or subjected to basic re-definition
through ecology. "Profit" and "growth" are in particular need of
re-evaluation.

Ecologically, all of nature works on a "profit" basis, where
the "profit"--solar surplus--comes from organisms and ecosystems
creating new biological wealth by taking in some form of solar-
derived energy or matter, and using this gain for their benefit,
which they then return to the Earth for redistribution when
they die. Similarly, all human economic enterprises, whether
they be state, private, and all forms in between, also must
create some margin of surplus (which may or may not be called
"profit," and which always comes from biological solar surplus or
other Earth resources) in order to survive.

From the working principles of ecology, we must translate a
new description of the solar-based surplus that is created by any
viable economic enterprise (or any living thing, for that matter)
and how that process fits into the ecosystems in which the enter-
prise is based. For the purpose of discussion, I suggest that
one percent would be a sustainable profit margin and growth rate
for any economic enterprise, corporation, or aggregate economy
complying reasonably to an ecological audit. One percent is the
rate of efficiency by which the process of photosynthesis can fix
solar energy and convert it to biomass. The capacity of photosynthetic
fixation and transformation of solar energy into utilizable biomass is
the basic enabling process of life, and therefore of all natural and human
economies. I suggest that a directly solar-driven one percent is
a rate of growth and "profit" that is sustainable on Earth.

Of course over time even 1% could get out of hand, and thus this contingency
needs be addressed as ecological rules currently require that all entities
on Earth must have reasonable life spans, give up what they
have accumulated in their lifetimes, and this includes corporations. The legal
fiction of corporate immortality has got to be ended. Corporations must
have a reasonable chartered life span, at the end of which, in order to be
re-chartered, they must pass an ecological audit to justify their continued
existence appropriate to whatever current ecological/social contexts
obtain at that time relative to the consensus of what constitutes a healthy
equilibrium.

Thursday, December 3, 2009

The dysfunctions of subsidy

Part two of David Haenke's paper on Ecological Economics:

As our political and economic systems continue to support the pillage of the earth, this selection of writing focused on outlining the dysfunction of our current subsity based economic paradigm is more and more pertinent to understanding what the problems are, and how to fix them.

read on....

The dysfunctions of subsidy


Viewed ecologically, the dominant economic order of the
nations and transnational corporations is inherently contradictory
and non-sustainable, nowhere more so than with regard to
subsidies.

The national- and transnational-scale industrial operations
of corporations and governments derive their profitability and
"viability" through massive subsidies of many kinds. These entities
skim off profits or surpluses gained primarily through the
great volume of their subsidized activity, growing through feeding
off undervalued resources and labor. It is the inefficiency
and destructiveness of their use of such enormous quantities of
these resources--often for unnecessary or even trivial purposes --
that is the prime agent of human-caused entropy, or
"economic cancer," resulting from the generation of
vast amounts of pollution and toxic waste, as well as general
social and ecological disintegration.

What if we were to do an ecological audit of whole economic
systems, of socialism, capitalism and the "free market", of the
global economy, of the United States? The results would be
startling, shaking the very foundations of the nations and the
global trading system.

Ecological cost evaluation -- ecological auditing -- of the
international economy will show a system that is thoroughly
unsustainable. Our fragile and finite planet's resources and
ability to absorb wastes cannot continue to support the massive
scale of fossil fuel driven production and transport of physical
goods all over the planet.

Despite the increasingly desperate, depleted state of societies
and ecosystems all over the world, international prices --
both relative and real -- for labor and many key types of primary
resources and raw materials needed for large scale industrial
activity continue to fall or remain steady. This is occurring in
the face of escalating social and ecological costs.

How can this be happening? It is because the financial
machinery of the dominant market nations and the transnational
corporations is geared towards driving down global prices of
labor, natural resources, and basic commodities: a goal of "Free
Trade". Every laborer, independent farmer, and small business in
the world is forced to compete in selling their labor and
production against the buying and selling power of multinational
corporations and the hourly wage of the most desperate of
sweatshop workers in Asia, Africa, or Latin America.

The economic leverage needed by governments and national- and
transnational -scale corporations to enable this global price
distortion is provided by government subsidies: varied, massive,
pervasive, often hidden. Primary among these subsidies are broad
(often planetary) access to natural resources, labor, and capital
at radically undervalued prices, these prices supported by tax-
payers' money; also included are cheap land leases, tax incen-
tives, resource depletion allowances, loan guarantees, regulatory
favoritism, contract preference, and outright government grants
for product and marketing research and development. Both taxpayers
and mother nature unwittingly underwrite corporate costs and
profits, while absorbing and paying for the pollutants and their
cleanup. Not only that, the publics of the world's nations end
up servicing the gargantuan debts run up by the international
corporate trading and banking systems. For example, the 1980's
S & L scandal in the U.S. was strongly connected to international
corporate resource speculation, particularly in oil.

With all this, along with the great volume and scale of
production and distribution, it's not hard to see where the
profit margins come from. As Herman Daly has pointed out, in
this international system, benefits are privatized, costs socialized.
Or to put it more succinctly, the essence of the present maco-economy
is : "Privatize profits; socialize cost's". (Daly and Cobb, For The Common
Good, 1989, p. 231).

If the majority of the world's larger economic enterprises
and national economies were made to pay their way in terms of
full ecologically-audited costs of their raw materials, labor,
production-distribution operations, waste, and pollution, most of
them would go bankrupt in a very short time, along with the
governments that support and subsidize them.

It is this kind of economics of profit subsidy for the
largest, most powerful, and most centralized economic entities
that most thoroughly fails an ecological audit and most
compromises a future for human beings and other species on this
planet. Ecological economics clearly establishes that these
kinds of enterprises will eventually fall. They violate most
ecological principles, and many moral ones, as well as making a
mockery of the "free enterprise" market system that they claim to
represent. The biggest question is: how much will they take with
them when they go down. The kind of politico-economics that
combines the least functional aspects of capitalism with those of
socialism I call "special interest socialism", or "corporate socialism".

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Gaia, Economics, Money, and Wealth

Whirling and swirling conversations with David Haenke in the heart of the Ozarks have lead me to begin a series of posts of his seminal, and as yet, unpublished works on the leading edge of the planetary evolution towards cultures, and ecologies of regeneration.

The next 8 posts will focus on Bioregionalism and Ecological Economics


Part one:

Gaia, Economics, Money, and Wealth

by David Haenke


According to scientist James Lovelock's Gaia Theory, the
earth is a single living organism, one vast self-regulating,
self-organizing, self-healing ecological body. This understand-
ing underlies the necessary reconfiguration of all human systems,
particularly economics. More than "Gaia Theory", I submit that
this is "Gaia Reality", Earth reality.

Earth reality mandates this: All human systems -- towns and
cities, transport, technologies, agriculture, manufacture,
energy, housing, production, distribution, consumption -- must be
designed to be ecologically resonant and responsible. The
best place to find the necessary design principles and patterns is
in close observation of the function of intact natural ecosys-
tems, i.e., nature's economy. The ecological designs of nature's
economy are perfected over billions of years, unmatched in intri-
cacy and efficiency by anything we have yet created. Earth's
proven ecological designs run systems which are powered entirely
by renewable energy, recycle materials at a 100% level and there-
by waste nothing, produce no debilitating levels of pollution or
toxics, self-regulate, and are phenomenally abundant. Given our
present terminal situation, is this not something to emulate?

The true source and measure of value and wealth is not money
or any kind of human currency. Rather, it is the resources and
ecological integrity of the Earth. At the same time, whatever
(derivative) value and measure of wealth that money carries is
backed solely by earth's ecological integrity, and comes fully
and directly from the earth and the resources of its ecosystems.
This is the most radical and universally ignored economic truth.
Money, and all of economics, has no function, no reality outside
of ecological reality.

Ecology and economics come from the same root word. Hope-
fully before it's too late, humanity will see that good economics
must be also good ecology: ECO-ECONOMICS. This is the "unified
field theory" and practice for economics.

After 250 years, an answer to the central question

Two hundred-fifty years ago the industrial revolution - along with
the acceleration of the enclosure of the commons and the rising
of the power of the nation state - began to tear apart the fabric
of all human societies and the natural world, a process that
continues to this day.

The result was social upheaval, forcible eviction from the
land of the peasant populations to be driven to the cities and
towns to work in wage slavery in the mills, horrific working
conditions, child labor exploitation, the swelling of foul slums
in the cities... This list is long and familiar. At the same
time, dominant new classes endowed with previously unheard of
material wealth and power were created. The combined political-
economic power of capitalism, technology, and the state became a
monster running rampant. The great question: how to control it.

Powerful new ideas and movements rose to address and combat
these forces. Chief among them was Marxism. Marx, and those who
followed him, for all their brilliant analysis, and for all the
revolutionary upheaval they caused, provided the wrong answers.
For one thing, their alternatives encompassed too many of the
evils of the systems they opposed. They embraced industrialism,
and centralization, combined with of the political-economic power
of the state. Their main quarrel was with who owned and con-
trolled these forces and institutions, and less by what principles they were
run. They did not question the basic nature of the forces
themselves. They also failed to discern the most important factor
of all, the mandates of nature, of ecology. Of course hardly anyone
prominent in the industrializing West -- capitalist or otherwise -- was
paying much attention to nature in Marx's time, except to come up with
ways to conquer and overcome the natural world.

On the other side of the great question, Adam Smith proposed
that the "invisible hand" of the market system would serve to
perfect it and bring land, labor, and capital into a functional
equilibrium. Unfortunately he was unable to identify the true
"invisible hand", just as all classical and neo-classical econo-
mists have failed to do since. Smith and his descendants predi-
cated the successful functioning of the market mechanism on an
unlimited store of goods and services from nature's cornucopic
warehouses. Again, the root of all, nature's finite economy, the
true "invisible hand" was ignored.

For two hundred-fifty years, the economists of the left, right,
and center, and all those in the positions of power who listen to
them have presided over a world on fire. They have failed to
answer the central burning question: how to regulate and control
the forces created by the interlinking of capitalism, industrial-
ism, technology, and the nation state.

In ecological economics we finally have the answer. Ecology
regulates capitalism. Indeed, it is the ultimate regulator of
all economic enterprises and systems in any world (and as
economics is the real root of politics), whether they refer to
themselves as “left,” “right,” or “center.”

One of the major reasons that socialism fails is that it is
unable to determine and allocate real costs. Market economics
and capitalism as presently functioning have been better at
determining prices at the gross monetary level, but their time of
reckoning has arrived as they fail to assess and pay true
ecological costs, which are the real costs.

When we make ecological principles, practices, and values
central to the market system, and we have the new economics of
Earth: eco-economics, the true prerequisite for sustainability.

Ecological economics gives business and the market
the tools for internal self-evaluation and self-regulation.
Based on true cost accounting, what is best for both the
social and the ecosystemic community is best for the long term
viability of any given economic enterprise. The need for
governmental and other external control is diminished. The
market system can operate as it was meant to. The primary tool
for internal self-evaluation and regulation is the ecological
audit (described later).

The economics of cancer / the cancer of economics

The Earth is sick -- suffering from accelerated entropy --
from the activities of human beings living out of ecological
balance. The primary agent of the sickness is conventional human
economics. The biological roots of ecological economics give us
potent ways to understand the forces that afflict us and our
planet. Cancer in metastasis is the best way that we can ade-
quately describe what our interest and speculative investment-
driven industrial economic systems are now doing to life on
Earth. Both cancer and our economic systems grow primarily for
the sake of growing, while they busily disorder, toxify, and
finally destroy their host body. It is startling and incredible
that virtually every nation and corporation on Earth continues to
hysterically promote unlimited and undifferentiated economic
growth at any cost in the face of its clearly cancerous conse-
quences.

Everywhere we look we can see the living fabric of life,
prairies, forests, savannas, estuaries and swamps - the healthy
tissue of the Earth's body - being replaced by trash development,
buildings, stores, parking lots, factories, the power lines,
sewer lines, and roads. These systemic extensions of the economic
cancer grow into the afflicted ecosystem, sucking nutrients
and spewing poison like the mal-formed vascular and other tissue
networks created by cancers in the human body.

When you watch a road being built you are literally watching
the Earth cancer at work, growing an extension of its deadly
vascular system, a new pathway for its metastasizing, entropy-
spewing killer cells, the automobiles.

The bare cultivated fields are, as described by Wes Jackson,
"lesions", as are the mange-like sore spots of clear-cut forests,
as seen from the air. From space or high altitude the cities
look like tumors, as often described by astronauts, and they see
the vast fires of the rainforests burning. On the highways of
the United States, 200 to 500 million animals are run over and
killed each years, dwarfing in number the tens of thousands of
humans killed. These animals are literally the diminishing
healthy cells and tissues of GAIA, as are the lung-like forests,
devastated and diminished. From the bare fields of cancer agri-
culture the eroded soil runs like blood. The affliction reaches
out to afflict the ozone. The air is poisoned. Each industrial
factory is a concentrated, potent tumor, as are the largest
cities. Each industrial accident, explosion, fire, leakage of
toxic chemicals, is part of the pandemic toxification, and the
poison-spewing death process of the cancer tumors themselves.
This will increase radically as time passes and nothing is seri-
ously done to bring our economic systems into a condition of
ecological responsibility.

The simultaneous ethnocide and ecocide of indigenous peoples
and the lands where they live is an action of the mega-cancer to
kill another crucial part of the fabric and spirit of the Earth.
Within the indigenous peoples and the land they are woven into is
the living spirit and reflective intelligence of nature, the last
people on Earth who really know how to live sustainably and can
by their example tell the rest of us.

Holistic ways to prevent and deal with cancer in the human
body can be extrapolated to economic cancer and the Earth.
Ecological economics is such a healing strategy.

The ecological dysfunctions of interest

Income from interest and all money realized from speculatively
playing stock and futures markets is ecologically and thermo-
dynamically indefensible, a major factor in the of the Earth's
disease. This kind of "income" constitutes a demand that the
Earth yield up whatever energy and resource-related goods and
services the bearer asks for when this illusory money is present-
ed for redemption. Such money is at work ransacking the planet,
fueling the unrestrained growth demanded by governments and
corporations, in order to create more illusory money and
"wealth". This shell game is directed from the stock markets,
boardrooms, and capitols of the world, where the money flows to
and from. Demand becomes insatiable, as interest/speculation
money increasingly self-creates, demanding more fruits of the
Earth, which must be further exploited to produce them. The
interest and inflation rates, the Dow Jones, the Nikke, and the
other industrial stock market averages are the fever charts of
the Earth.

Using eco-auditing as its prime evaluative tool, ecological
economics regulates interest, and speculative stock and futures
market income, and works to phase out all aspects of economic
growth economy which are ecologically- and socially-undifferentiated.